Save Merton Hall Judicial Review claim in High Court
Save Merton Hall Judicial Review claim in High Court
Latest: Jan. 18, 2018
Update
The claim for a Judicial Review was due to be heard in court today. Late yesterday afternoon (17 Jan 2018) at the 11th hour, I received the decision on my application for statutory listing of M…
Read moreOn September 21st, Merton’s planning committee granted permission to demolish the majority of John Innes’ 1899 Merton Hall in Wimbledon and to redevelop it into a warehouse style building for Elim Pentecostal Church.
This is part of a controversial freehold land swap deal to give Merton Hall to Elim Pentecostal Church in exchange for their industrial warehouse site on High Path SW19.
Given the public outcry which saw over 3,700 petition signatures on 38 degrees Save Merton Hall, and hundreds of written objections to Merton Council against the scheme, I have lodged a claim in the High Court for a judicial review to challenge Merton Council’s decision to grant the planning permission.
A judge will decide in the next few weeks whether the claim should be granted permission to proceed to a full hearing by the High Court.
Merton Hall is unique and has many fine Queen Anne-style architectural features which prompted me to apply to Historic England for statutory listing. I am awaiting the outcome of a fast track application.
Merton Hall was built for the community by philanthropist and property developer John Innes, himself a household name, and was designed by his architect Henry Goodall Quartermain. Unusually, it served the dual purpose of a community hall and a masonic lodge.
It has continued to operate as a community hall, embracing all without distinction to religion, race or sexual orientation.
Thousands of residents, and members of the public who signed the petition, are appalled that in addition to the freehold land swap which removes Merton Hall from public hands forever, at least 80 percent of the well-structured original building - including fine ceiling plasterwork strongly resembling those in John Innes’ Grade II home down the road, - will be demolished .
The replacement is a windowless worship hall in a warehouse-style building, and a massive glass extension abutting what will remain of the front façade.
They also believe these new features are wholly out of place with the predominantly Victorian and Edwardian two-storey neighbourhood and streetscape.
More details are on the petition here: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-wimbledon-s-merton-hall-london-sw19
You can find more on Facebook Save Merton Hall
Twitter @SaveMertonHall
Email: [email protected]
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/row-erupts-over-plans-to-close-19th-century-hall-to-build-pentecostal-church-a3640081.html
You Can Help:
If the judge agrees to proceed with a High Court hearing, taking Merton Council to court will be very costly. Even if the judge decides not to allow the claim to proceed, I may be ordered to pay the Council's costs up to this stage.
I am asking you to back my attempt, as a resident, to challenge Merton Council’s planning decision.
Ultimately, that means funding. A Judicial Review costs generally between £20,000-£40,000. I have put my personal savings into this and now I am asking for help to see the process through.
Whatever you can afford in pennies or pounds will be appreciated - no sum is too small. If you are wanting to be extremely generous, for legal reasons, please do not exceed £3000.
None of the monies raised on CrowdJustice will ever enter my personal pocket or account. It goes directly to my appointed legal team Town Legal LLP,, a planning law firm, familiar with complex or controversial projects. Any monies left over will be churned back into another case of our choosing on the CrowdJustice platform.
Right now I need to raise £2,500 in order to allow funds to be released to my legal team (Town Legal LLP). There is a stretch target which will change according to need so please continue to support beyond the initial £2,500 target.
Get updates about this case
Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.
Be a promoter
Your share on Facebook could raise £26 for the case
I'll share on FacebookSave Merton Hall - Sara Sharp
Jan. 18, 2018
Update
The claim for a Judicial Review was due to be heard in court today. Late yesterday afternoon (17 Jan 2018) at the 11th hour, I received the decision on my application for statutory listing of Merton Hall.
Sadly, Historic England did not recommend listing Merton Hall and the Department of Culture Media and Sport agreed with their recommendation.
As a result, the case for the JR which hinged on the listing was hugely diminished and after discussions with my legal team, on advice, I reluctantly had to withdraw my claim.
I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your incredible support, both financial - which has helped towards paying some of the legal costs - and emotional. Your messages of support have been heartening and encouraging.
Do follow for further updates on Twitter and Facebook @SaveMertonHall and at the petition page on 38degrees https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-wimbledon-s-merton-hall-london-sw19
Thank you
Sara
Get updates about this case
Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.
Recent contributions