Protect Southampton's Marlhill Copse

by Gareth Narbed

Protect Southampton's Marlhill Copse

by Gareth Narbed
Gareth Narbed
Case Owner
I was horrified to discover the proposed devastation to this beautiful woodland when walking from my house to the local garden centre. I only have a small pension from Hampshire County Council.
Closed
on 20th June 2019
£35
pledged of £6,000 target from 2 pledges
Gareth Narbed
Case Owner
I was horrified to discover the proposed devastation to this beautiful woodland when walking from my house to the local garden centre. I only have a small pension from Hampshire County Council.

Southampton City Council has allowed the airport to reduce the height of 219 trees at Marlhill Copse. Some will be completely felled (at least 20) and about 93 ‘crown-reduced’ by over 10 metres. I have taken out a High Court injunction forbidding any tree-works pending consideration of a Judicial Review.

In order to expand, Southampton airport wants to fly heavier planes that need a shallower take off angle. Marlhill Copse obstructs this. Despite commercial profit not air safety being at the heart of this matter, the City Council has agreed to the works in this Conservation Area with Tree Preservation Orders.

This is an absurdity:

1. Parliament and the City Council have declared a Climate Emergency and the Government's Committee on Climate Change has advised us all to reduce our hunger for air travel.

2. Urban woodland has been shown to reduce health costs, through absorbing pollutants, and is calculated to save the UK more than £205 million each year [Office of National Statistics - 2017].

This campaign is supported by Extinction Rebellion and Friends of the Earth.

Get updates about this case

Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.

Recent contributions

Be a promoter

Your share on Facebook could raise £26 for the case

I'll share on Facebook

No updates yet

Get updates about this case

Subscribe to receive email updates from the case owner on the latest news about the case.

    There are no public comments on this case page.