KAREN PERRETT's case
KAREN PERRETT's case
This case is raising funds for its stretch target. Your pledge will be collected within the next 24-48 hours (and it only takes two minutes to pledge!)
Latest: Nov. 12, 2024
The claimant lost his appeal -Costs awarded in my favour so far
On 27/9/2024 and concluding on 30/9/2024, His Honour Judge Salmon , heard arguments by Mr Gotti's counsel, David Hirst, claiming that there were in fact 'No Proceedings afoot ' in this ca…
Read moreMy name is Karen Perrett and I used to run a highly engaged Facebook group which I set up to help people research cosmetic surgeons by seeing and questioning real past patient results .
I invested over £28000 into a project to develop a website to help support my Facebook group but I was forced into ceasing trading because of the consequences of being sued by the founder of a Cosmetic clinic, a man called Christian Gotti.
He claimed that I had set up another Facebook page where I was allegedly hiding under an alias called "Deirdre foster" and that I had set up this secondary group in order to defame his clinic and staff.
I am not this alias and I told him this.I also denied that I had defamed him or any of his clinic connections. I even told him whom I believed the true person behind the alias to be ,because this was fairly easy to trace from the screenshots of the group that he had provided as evidence to the court. He refused to believe me and pursued an injunction against me, which he won because he didn't have to prove that I was the alias in order to get an emergency injunction. He used the situation to his favour and his lawyer explicitly indicated that I ought to 'stay off Facebook' following the injunction which was the very place where my customers for my new business were found. So I effectively couldn't trade and I lost a lot of income as a result as well as wasting a lot of money on a website that I couldn't develop as I had planned (Because I didn't have full and complete access to my prospective clients).
Mr Gotti's lawyer; Mr J N Stachiw, threatened me with prison and contempt of court proceedings repeatedly and he explicitly used the words ‘Prison’ ; ‘Commital’(to prison); ‘Contempt’ and ‘Criminal’ more than 12 times over the course of a year and in various separate letters and emails to me. At one point while trying to get me to pay his clients costs ,Mr Stachiw wrote to tell me that :- 'There is no negotiation on the above. Either accept or we proceed to a full trial and will be making an application to commit you to prison' I was depressed and constantly in a state of despair over my situation.I had lost weight and had to take antidepressents and zopiclone to help me sleep at night. Mr Gotti's lawyer sent photos of my property and items I had sold and holidays I had been on in past years as well as birthday gifts from more than 5 years previous which he took from my personal social media accounts.He said that the ownership of these items and the value of my house (which he had looked up) meant that I should be paying his clients fees. He didn't believe my claim that i was impercunious and he suggested that I should be paying for a lawyer ,rather than representing myself.
The person whom I believed to be the real person behind the alias "Deirdre Foster", was blind copied into at least one of the emails from Mr Gotti's lawyer to me. The same individual assisted Mr Gotti in his claim by telling him that my assertions were not correct and she was not the alias in question.I later corroborated further that she was indeed the correct person behind the alias because a kind member of the public was able to produce a Whatsapp chat where it apears she had admitted it from her own phone and also seemingly made a voice note of the same admission
I made an application earlier year seeking for the injunction to be discharged, which included extensive witness evidence setting my position out. Not long after I produced this evidence to Mr Gotti's lawyers, they said they regarded the injunction as having been granted in error and that in their view there were no proceedings at all .
This was despite the fact that they had relied on this injunction being in force and had confirmed several times that it had given their client what it wanted and also used it on many occasions to keep me off social media under the fear of the threat of imprisonment
They specifically gloated to me in 2023 that i was not able to work in cosmetic surgery anymore. Mr Gotti said through his lawyer that he was 'pleased' I had 'stayed off Facebook' and that I had 'probably reassessed my skillset and moved into other areas of work ' and 'May this new status quo continue'
It seemed that once I had proven my innocence, it suited them to try to wriggle out of paying my court costs as a consequence of the situation that they had caused. They now say that there are no proceedings to answer because their client neglected to complete the correct accompanying claim form when the injunction application was made and thus, there is no actual legal claim to answer and therefore, no jurisdiction by any judge to award costs in my favour.
Their account of events and arguments are disputed by me and are the subject of an upcoming appeal hearing.
It took me 6 months before I finally instructed lawyers as I could no longer bear to be accused of doing things I hadn't done under an alias that wasn't me and to be constantly harassed and bullied by their lawyer and repeatedly threatened with imprisonment
I am seeking to raise £5k to allow me to make a claim for my lost earnings, other damages, and legal costs from the claimant, which involves some unavoidable court fees and other disbursements.
If I am able to raise more than I need, this will be donated back to Crowd Justice in support of future Free Speech campaigns
Be a promoter
Your share on Facebook could raise £26 for the case
I'll share on FacebookKAREN PERRETT
Nov. 12, 2024
The claimant lost his appeal -Costs awarded in my favour so far
On 27/9/2024 and concluding on 30/9/2024, His Honour Judge Salmon , heard arguments by Mr Gotti's counsel, David Hirst, claiming that there were in fact 'No Proceedings afoot ' in this case and that therefore, the court did not have jurisdiction to hear any application on my part regarding my costs and aggravated damages accrued following Mr Gotti's original Claim last year
The appeal was refused and Costs of that hearing were awarded in my favour.Mr Gotti's counsel was quick to try to seek leave to appeal again through the high court and his application for this second appeal has now been submitted , but not yet approved by the high court.
Myself and my legal team, do not yet know if Mr Gotti will be successful in having a second appeal heard or not.But in the interim, his counsel had put in an application seeking to 'stay' or delay the costs award from the 27/9 hearing , citing that this would stifle the appeal if his client were to later win, because any costs already paid, might not be recoverable . (so he wanted a subsequent judge to put the costs order on hold effectively)
This request was ruled upon , on Friday last week and was also denied by His honour Judge Salmon. As this request also had to be relayed by a further Judicial assessment, expending more legal man hours and time, as well as representations from both counsel, there were even more costs to be considered.Judge salmon ordered again that those extra costs should also be met by Mr Gotti and so , his cost burden appears to be escalating with each application he makes
This has not been enough to deter him from pursuing his mission to seek a further appeal and so I await my fate on that subject and will update you all accordingly.Meanwhile, my campaign to raise funds continues as I am still required to attend a 2 day hearing at the end of March/begining of April 2025, when my costs and aggravated damages will be assessed.Expert evidence will be needed ahead of that hearing and I will be responsible for raising funds in support of that
So , my stress levels and cost burden is still omnipresent as we head into the christmas period
I remain optimistic that Mr Gotti may realise that 'the chickens appear to be coming home to roost' and make me a sensible offer to settle before that hearing is upon us.However , as this does not seem to be in keeping with the pattern of events , thus far, I will be putting my energy into ensuring that i am best placed, to show the full impact of how these proceedings have affected me to date on a 'whole of life' basis-Physical;Mental; fianancial...My whole 'rasion d'etre and confidence has been destroyed and I hope to be able to attain a reasonable and just settlement in support of that impact
Recent contributions